BREAKING: State judge rules officials can’t tell voters photo ID required to cast ballot

OCTOBER 9, 2018

Below is a report that DML News gives a 4 OUT OF 4 STARS trustworthiness rating. We base this rating on the following criteria:

  • Provides named sources
  • Reported by more than one notable outlet
  • Does not insert opinion or leading words
  • Includes supporting video, direct statements, or photos

Click here to read more about our rating system.

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News offers the following information published by

A Missouri judge on Tuesday ruled that state election officials can no longer spread materials that indicate voters must provide a photo ID in order to cast a ballot, Reuters reported.

The news outlet reported that Judge Richard Callahan, who sits on the Cole County Circuit Court, ruled that the materials must also specify other forms of identifications that voters can show. He additionally wrote that state authorities can’t require people who are otherwise qualified to vote to sign a sworn statement.

The article goes on to state the following:

The ruling effectively blocked a portion of Missouri’s voter identification law one month before November’s midterm elections.

Priorities USA, a Democratic super PAC that filed the lawsuit in June, hailed the ruling as a win for voting rights, Reuters reported.

CLICK HERE to read more from The Hill.

To weigh in on this information provided by, engage in our LIVE CHAT below. Scroll down.


  1. Mary October 9th, 2018 at 11:48 pm

    Here we go! The Democrats ruling against ID to show if you are eligible to vote. Of course it’s a democratic liberal judge working for fraudulent vote. This is only the beginning. We need voter ID


  2. Angel Chong October 9th, 2018 at 11:58 pm

    That’s good news for all the underrepresented ranks of the dead!


  3. Barry Marshall Jones Sr. October 10th, 2018 at 12:06 am

    Did we expect anything less from a liberal judge??? This is what Conservatives are up against, and this is the reason President Trump needs to get as many “Constitutionally” ruling judges in place ASAP !!!


  4. Steve Hardin October 10th, 2018 at 12:11 am

    Not qualified to be on the bench and should be removed if he can’t uphold the law.


  5. Katerlin October 10th, 2018 at 1:52 am

    You need ID when you order a drink. ID needed when you cash a check. ID when you board a plane is needed. However one of the most important things you do and no ID required. Only in Democratland where brains and common t is flushed down the toilet.


    • Katerlin October 10th, 2018 at 1:53 am

      Common sense is flushed down the toilet*


  6. Donna October 10th, 2018 at 2:57 am

    Sounds like something that should go to the Supreme Court! (now that we have the majority). Makes me wonder how many liberal causes will now avoid going to the Supreme Court in fear of losing. Fewer activist justices.


  7. ZS October 10th, 2018 at 8:12 am

    Voter fraud is on the judges head. If he too sfraid to uphold his oath of office which is uphold the Constitution. Petition to have him removed. Need to get people in office that are not scaredy cat weinies.


  8. Yvonne October 10th, 2018 at 8:51 am

    Judge rules : 🎶….and another one bites the dust. 🎶 Now on Trump’s list of replacements. Will people never learn the lesson? Huh?


  9. Nancy October 10th, 2018 at 10:01 am

    Wait a minute! We the People voted for this in the ballot and AGAIN they are ignoring us!
    So how about when we want to open a bank account we no longer need a photo ID?
    Fxxx the courts!


  10. Wpat October 10th, 2018 at 6:43 pm

    what come visit Missouri the new Mississippi.


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *