REPORT: Kavanaugh classmates rescind names from statement rejecting second accuser’s allegation

SEPTEMBER 25, 2018

Below is a report that DML News gives a 4 OUT OF 4 STARS trustworthiness rating. We base this rating on the following criteria:

  • Provides named sources
  • Reported by more than one notable outlet
  • Does not insert opinion or leading words
  • Includes supporting video, direct statements, or photos

Click here to read more about our rating system.

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News offers the following information published by WASHINGTONEXAMINER.COM:

Two former Yale University classmates of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh have rescinded their names from a statement casting doubt on Deborah Ramirez’s claim that Kavanaugh exposed himself to her at a college party in the 1980s.

Ramirez’s allegation against Kavanaugh was detailed in a piece published by The New Yorker on Sunday, where she claimed he thrust his groin in her face and caused her to touch his genitals without her consent. Kavanaugh has rejected the allegation, along with two of his male classmates that Ramirez claimed were present.

The article goes on to state the following:

Those classmates were named in a joint statement released by Kavanaugh’s attorneys, along with the wife of another male student allegedly involved and another classmate, insisting that they would have seen or heard about the event “and we did not.”

Louisa Garry and Dino Ewing signed that statement, but later contacted The New Yorker following publication of the article and requested their names be removed from the statement.

To weigh in on this information provided by WASHINGTONEXAMINER.COM, engage in our LIVE CHAT below. Scroll down.


  1. Patty September 25th, 2018 at 9:08 am

    My first thot was they don’t want to b involved in the insane circus!


  2. Sandra Newhouse September 25th, 2018 at 9:13 am

    Wonder how much they were paid to say this


  3. Kathy September 25th, 2018 at 9:25 am

    I think they just don’t want to be involved and suffer the backlash. Do you blame them?


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *