REPORT: Military Judge issues stunning ruling on 9/11 Guantánamo detainees

BY ANNETA GRIFFEE / AUGUST 18, 2018 /

GET the DML NEWS APP (FREE) Click Here

Below is a report that DML News gives a 4 OUT OF 4 STARS trustworthiness rating. We base this rating on the following criteria:

  • Provides named sources
  • Reported by more than one notable outlet
  • Does not insert opinion or leading words
  • Includes supporting video, direct statements, or photos

Click here to read more about our rating system.

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News offers the following information published by NYTimes.com:

In a potentially major setback for the effort to prosecute five Guantánamo Bay detainees accused of aiding the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, a military commission judge ruled on Friday that prosecutors may not use a key piece of evidence against the men: statements they made to F.B.I. interrogators shortly after their transfer out of the C.I.A.’s “black site” prisons nearly a dozen years ago.

The decision brought to a head a long-running and potentially irreconcilable tension in the case: Defense lawyers say they need to thoroughly investigate the torture of their clients at the hands of the C.I.A. for there to be a fair death penalty trial. But the government says there is a national security imperative to keep certain facts related to that period — like the identities of C.I.A. personnel who worked at certain prisons — secret.

The article goes on to state the following:

The ruling centered on a fight over a technique the F.B.I. used to try to get statements out of the detainees — including Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-described architect of the attacks — that could be used as courtroom evidence, despite their abuse in C.I.A. custody.

To attenuate that, the bureau sent in a “clean team,” whose agents did not know what the detainees had previously said, to start over with questioning them. But defense lawyers argue that the lingering effects of their clients’ previous torture tainted those interrogation sessions, too.

CLICK HERE to view the complete ruling.

To weigh in on this information provided by NYTimes.com, engage in our LIVE CHAT below. Scroll down.

Facebook has SIGNIFICANTLY reduced the distribution of DML NEWS posts, and instead fills newsfeeds with news from the mainstream media. The way to fight back is by sharing our posts with your family and friends. Please take a moment now and click the share button. SHARE NOW



DML News offered you the above information as part of our ongoing effort to educate and inform people around the world. You can obtain additional information by visiting NYTimes.com

2 Comments

  1. Steve August 18th, 2018 at 7:09 pm

    After they were interrogated they should have been executed immediately.They carried out a heinous act of terrorism against our country killing thousands of innocent people.Instead of attacking Iraq,we should have went after Saudi Arabia,that’s where most of these bastards are from

    Reply

  2. ZS August 18th, 2018 at 8:04 pm

    Exactly Steve. They’ve been hanging around too long and treated decently. Never gave those Americans they killed any chance. They should have been disposed of right away.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *