REPORT: Nancy Pelosi On N.C. Election Fraud: We Can Refuse To Seat That Congressman

Sign up for our newsletter

GET the DML NEWS APP (FREE) Click Here

Below is a report that DML News gives a 4 OUT OF 4 STARS trustworthiness rating. We base this rating on the following criteria:

  • Provides named sources
  • Reported by more than one notable outlet
  • Does not insert opinion or leading words
  • Includes supporting video, direct statements, or photos

Click here to read more about our rating system.

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News offers the following information published by

WASHINGTON ― House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Thursday that election officials in North Carolina have a few options for responding to what appears to be an egregious case of election fraud in the state’s 9th Congressional District.

Members of Congress have an option, too: They can refuse to seat the current leader of the race, Republican Mark Harris.

Pelosi is referring to the scandal unfolding in two North Carolina counties where investigators are trying to figure out whether there’s a nefarious reason so many absentee ballots were never mailed back. In Bladen County, which has a large black population, 40 percent of absentee ballots were never returned. A whopping 62 percent of absentee ballots were not mailed back in nearby Robeson County, which is 38 percent Native American. Both counties far exceeded the district’s non-return rate of 24 percent, and Bladen was the only county in which Harris won the mail-in absentee vote.

In recent days, three people have come forward to local television station WSOC and BuzzFeed News to say they were hired to collect absentee ballots, which violates state law. All of those people have said they worked for McCrae Dowless, a campaign operative with a criminal history who was working for a contractor on behalf of Harris.

The North Carolina State Board of Elections is planning to hold a public hearing by Dec. 21 to decide how to proceed.

To get more information about this article, please visit To weigh in, leave a comment below.

DML News offered you the above information as part of our ongoing effort to educate and inform people around the world. You can obtain additional information by visiting

Sign up for our newsletter


  1. Alyce Larson December 6th, 2018 at 6:38 pm

    By the same token, I think the Senate should refuse to seat the woman from Arizona that “won” that seat under dubious circumstances.


    • Vicki December 6th, 2018 at 7:46 pm

      I totally agree.


  2. Richard December 7th, 2018 at 2:12 pm

    This just more Democrat smoke. The Democrats are not above trying anything to create questions about the legitimacy of an election. Testing what they can use the next Presidential election in 2020, just wait, they will crawl the gutter to find it.


  3. Debbie December 7th, 2018 at 2:15 pm

    I also agree


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *