REPORT: NY Times makes rare case against Nancy Pelosi
As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News App offers the following information published by BREITBART.COM:
An editorial board member at the New York Times is weighing in on a post-impeachment scenario by coming out against the federal law that would put House Speaker Nancy Pelosi into the White House if President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence were both removed.
The author argued that the law that puts Pelosi second in line behind the vice president should be changed.
The article goes on to state the following:
The reason? Pelosi is in charge of impeaching the man she could replace. “In short, it’s a whopping conflict of interest for a lawmaker to be leading an impeachment inquiry that could result in her own ascension to the presidency,” the editorial said.
In their editorial, the New York Times also suggested another reason why Pelosi should not be president, if Trump and Pence are both ousted. They write:
Don’t the American people choose presidents largely because of their parties? Yes, they do, which is why the prospect of Ms. Pelosi, the veteran San Francisco Democrat, sitting behind the Resolute Desk in the middle of a Republican administration should trouble anyone who values stability and democratic legitimacy.
CLICK HERE to read more.
This piece changed my mind. Not sure what more one can say to recommend a piece of opinion writing. https://t.co/ACthkjJwi0
— Binyamin Appelbaum (@BCAppelbaum) November 4, 2019
“In short, it’s a whopping conflict of interest for a lawmaker to be leading an impeachment inquiry that could result in her own ascension to the presidency,” the editorial said. https://t.co/CWD7kLhtKL
— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) November 5, 2019
To get more information about this article, please visit BREITBART.COM. To weigh in, leave a comment below.
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.